[December 2012]
I’ve now completed a first draft of Chapter
1, charting the spread of Lutheran ideas in Jagiellonian Poland, but writing this narrative
has exposed a raft of issues. All earlier accounts of these events have told
the story region by region – here’s what happened in Cracow,
1517-40; now for Prussia
in this same period... I always found these rather frustrating as reader, because I felt I wasn’t getting a
joined up picture, so I decided to give a panoramic chronological account in my
book, going through in effect year by year, showing what kind of bigger story
emerges if you talk about Zygmunt I’s monarchy as a whole. One major purpose of
narratives, from medieval chronicles onwards, is to impose some order and
coherence on what is otherwise an inchoate series of events. But reading over
my first draft, I can see that if you go meticulously through year by year,
your narrative retains far too much of the disorientating original confusion of
these events. A rigidly chronological narrative also becomes quite repetitive -
there was a set of heresy trials in Cracow
(1521); and another (1525), oh look and a few more (1530). Confusing and
repetitive are certainly not what I’m aiming for in my first chapter, however
authentic to the original grain of events…
The very concept of ‘events’ is also
proving tricky. Certain aspects of the early Reformation in Poland easily lend themselves to a good narrative
and a gripping story – domestic servants and unemployed sailors storming the
squares of a Baltic port; a plot to blow up King Zygmunt I as he slept in the town hall of Danzig one spring night; a peasant
uprising in the name of Christian liberty. But a lot of the evidence for
Lutheran sympathy in Poland
in these years comes from much smaller facts, which don’t necessarily
constitute events per se – a cache of Lutheran books owned by a Poznań merchant, a noble
employing a Lutheran tutor to educate his sons, a rumour of an invading
Protestant army from the Empire… Trying to integrate both kinds of material –
dramatic happenings, and piecemeal evidence – into a coherent chronological
narrative is proving tricky. So, time for a second draft.
No comments:
Post a Comment