I’ve agreed to give a paper later this
month in Budapest , at a Reformation conference
organised by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, and I’ve promised that this
paper will be an overview of the Elusive Church
book project.
This sounded straightforward enough when I
gave my kind hosts the title. I’ve given ‘book overview’ papers several times
before. These condensed my first monograph into a 50 or even 20 minute talk,
and they were very quick to write. I’m realising, however, that there’s a
crucial difference between giving a bird’s-eye, condensed tour of a book you’ve
already written, with the arguments reasonably crisp in your own, and of talking
authoritatively about a book you’ve not yet drafted.
On the plus side, if you give a paper on a
book post-publication and people in the audience make very perceptive points
about things you’ve missed or could explore differently, all you can do is
smile thinly, and swallow the sinking feeling, knowing it’s too late. Whereas
whatever feedback colleagues in Budapest might offer, there is still plenty of scope to act on it…
No comments:
Post a Comment